IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/stabus/3940.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gender, Self-Beliefs, and Closing the Initial Salary Gap in Quantitative Field

Author

Listed:
  • Sterling, Adina

    (Stanford U)

  • Gilmartin, Shannon
  • Sheppard, Sheri

Abstract

Scholars suggest more women should enter lucrative jobs like those in engineering and computer science to reduce the existing gender gap in pay, but also point out women's self-beliefs in their abilities in these domains lack men's in ways that may reduce women’s pay. We develop theory that suggests even if women's self-beliefs lag men's, self-beliefs need not be the pathway by which the gender pay gap closes: this might be achieved by influencing employers' beliefs regardless of women's self-beliefs. Using an original three-wave NSF-funded longitudinal survey of 559 engineering and computer science students that graduated from over two dozen institutions in the U.S. between 2015-2017, we find support for our theory. While women make less than men, the gender wage gap closes when women receive offers after a period of time when employers themselves have been able to verify a woman's abilities--i.e. in internships--and this has a larger effect than self-beliefs on the salaries of women, while the opposite is the case for men. We close with a discussion of our theory and how recognizing 'remediation fallacies' in the way equitable outcomes are achieved advances theory on gender, labor markets, and organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Sterling, Adina & Gilmartin, Shannon & Sheppard, Sheri, 2021. "Gender, Self-Beliefs, and Closing the Initial Salary Gap in Quantitative Field," Research Papers 3940, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:3940
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:3940. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gsstaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.