The complementarity of RJVs and R&D subsidies when absorptive capacity matters
AbstractThis paper introduces a model of coordination of research paths into the theory of Research Joint Ventures (RJVs). A comparison of RJVs and licensing by non-cooperative firms shows that the latter may be unable to co-ordinate on complementary research paths whereas RJVs are always able to do this. This happens when the acquisition of absorptive capacity is costly. It is shown that the policies of promoting RJVs and subsidizing R&D are complementary, whereas either policy by itself may reduce welfare. Finally it is shown that costly absorptive capacity gives rise to a welfare loss that is very difficult to address.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Royal Economic Society in its series Royal Economic Society Annual Conference 2002 with number 178.
Date of creation: 29 Aug 2002
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Office of the Secretary-General, School of Economics and Finance, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 9AL, UK
Phone: +44 1334 462479
Web page: http://www.res.org.uk/society/annualconf.asp
More information through EDIRC
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2002-07-08 (All new papers)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.