IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ebg/heccah/1078.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Accounting Quality and Debt Concentration: Evidence from Internal Control Weakness Disclosures

Author

Listed:
  • Lou , Yun
  • Otto , Clemens

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of accounting quality on the degree of debt concentration (i.e., the tendency to rely predominantly on only a few types of debt) in corporate capital structures. Building on theoretical and empirical studies arguing that asymmetric information increases the renegotiation and bankruptcy costs associated with relying on multiple types of debt, the authors predict that lower quality accounting numbers induce firms to choose more concentrated debt structures. Measuring (low) accounting quality with the existence of material internal control weaknesses over financial reporting (ICWs), they find evidence consistent with their prediction: Firms choose more concentrated debt structures after experiencing ICWs. This effect is stronger for more severe ICWs (i.e., company-level rather than account specific ICWs). We find similar results using accounting restatements and audit quality as alternative measures of accounting quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Lou , Yun & Otto , Clemens, 2014. "Accounting Quality and Debt Concentration: Evidence from Internal Control Weakness Disclosures," HEC Research Papers Series 1078, HEC Paris.
  • Handle: RePEc:ebg:heccah:1078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2532386
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Petya Platikanova & Kazbi Soonawalla, 2020. "Who monitors opaque borrowers? Debt specialisation, institutional ownership, and information opacity," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(2), pages 1867-1904, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    N/A;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebg:heccah:1078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antoine Haldemann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hecpafr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.