This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Ownership, System of reimbursement and Mortality rate relationships

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Carine Milcent

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

The issue is the real effect of the hospital type on the mortality rate. The statistical results on the mortality rate by hospital type (ownership and system of reimbursement) can lead to tremendous misinterpretations. According to statistical results we could conclude that the incentive created by fee-for-service reimbursement allows on 8 point save on the mortality rate. In fact, this ranking on hospital quality is completely dependant of characteristics and illness severity of patients. The computation on mortality rate by age structure crossed with sex totally changes the ranking. To take into account this difficulty, we use a innovative duration model applied to panel data. We consider a duration model with two kinds of unobserved heterogeneity, patient unobserved heterogeneity and hospital unobserved heterogeneity. No assumption of distribution is done on the latter component. By taking into account the observable and unobservable patient heterogeneity, we control the fact that patients admitted in the private sector can be different in term of disease gravity than patients admitted in the public one. We find that the hospital type effect on the instantaneous death probability depends more on the capacity to perform innovative procedure than on the system of reimbursement and/or the ownership. However, hospitals of the private sector both provide more innovative procedures and are more numerous to adopt innovation. Thereby, hospitals of the private sector provide a better quality of care, measured by the probability of dying. Nevertheless, heterogeneity within the type of hospital is bigger in the for-profit hospitals in comparison with the other types of hospital. It suggests that by choosing for-profit hospital, the patient of reference have in average, a lower of instantaneous probability of dying but are less sure about the quality of the hospital.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.delta.ens.fr/abstracts/wp200318.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by DELTA (Ecole normale supérieure) in its series DELTA Working Papers with number 2003-18.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 2003
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:del:abcdef:2003-18

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 48 boulevard Jourdan - 75014 Paris
Phone: 01 43 13 63 00
Fax: 01 43 13 63 10
Email:
Web page: http://www.delta.ens.fr/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: ().

Related research
Keywords:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Gabriel Picone & Shin-Yi Chou & Frank Sloan, 2002. "Are For-Profit Hospital Conversions Harmful to Patients and to Medicare?," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 33(3), pages 507-523, Autumn.
  2. Heckman, James & Singer, Burton, 1984. "A Method for Minimizing the Impact of Distributional Assumptions in Econometric Models for Duration Data," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(2), pages 271-320, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Propper, Carol & Burgess, Simon & Green, Katherine, 2004. "Does competition between hospitals improve the quality of care?: Hospital death rates and the NHS internal market," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(7-8), pages 1247-1272, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. David M. Cutler & Jill R. Horwitz, 1998. "Converting Hospitals from Not-for-profit to For-profit Status," NBER Working Papers 6672, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Ho, Vivian, 2002. "Learning and the evolution of medical technologies: the diffusion of coronary angioplasty," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 873-885, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Frank A. Sloan & Gabriel A. Picone & Donald H. Taylor, Jr. & Shin-Yi Chou, 1998. "Hospital Ownership and Cost and Quality of Care: Is There a Dime's Worth of Difference?," NBER Working Papers 6706, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  7. Pauly, Mark V & Redisch, Michael, 1973. "The Not-For-Profit Hospital as a Physicians' Cooperative," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 63(1), pages 87-99, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  8. Elaine Silverman & Jonathan Skinner, 2001. "Are For-Profit Hospitals Really Different? Medicare Upcoding and Market Structure," NBER Working Papers 8133, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. Daniel P. Kessler & Mark B. McClellan, 2002. "The Effects of Hospital Ownership on Medical Productivity," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 33(3), pages 488-506, Autumn.
Full references

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Bernhard Boockmann. & Dragana Djurdjevic. & Guillaume Horny. & François Laisney., 2009. "Bayesian estimation of Cox models with non-nested random effects: an application to the ratification of ILO conventions by developing countries," Documents de Travail 249, Banque de France. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  2. Mehdi Farsi & Geert Ridder, 2006. "Estimating the out-of-hospital mortality rate using patient discharge data," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(9), pages 983-995. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc also has a blog.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-6.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.