The distributional effects of growth : case studies vs. Cross-country regressions
AbstractConsiderable attention has been devoted lately to the empirical relationship between growth and inequality. Mostly based on cross-sectional econometric analysis, this literature is largely inconclusive in the sense that no systematically significant relationship has been found between distribution indicators and growth rates or their known determinants. Were such a result granted, it would be tempting to conclude that ‘growth is good for the poor’ whatever the nature of growth, as recently done in an influential paper by Dollar and Kraay (2001). The present paper adopts a different perspective. Using a few case studies and an original micro-economic methodology for decomposing time changes in the distribution of income, it shows that important socio-demographic factors are at work that may contribute to hiding the true distributional consequences of growth during a particular period of time in a given country. Because of the inherent difficulty of controlling for these factors, aggregate cross-country analysis may thus not be the best method for the study of the growth-inequality relationship.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by DELTA (Ecole normale supérieure) in its series DELTA Working Papers with number 2002-23.
Date of creation: 2002
Date of revision:
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
You can help add them by filling out this form.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.