IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crs/wpaper/2016-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Distinguishing the Confounding Factors: Policy Evaluation, High-Dimension and Variable Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Jérémy L'Hour

    (ENSAE ParisTech, CREST)

Abstract

Variable selection is an important question for policy evaluation when identification of the treatment effect relies on a conditional-on-observables strategy. Recent advances in variable selection methods, such as the Lasso, have been deemed useful for the econometrics of policy evaluation. The Lasso approach focuses on the computational feasibility of exhaustive model selection borrowing from procedures developed in a high-dimensional context. However, it has been seldom applied in policy evaluation works because it raises other di culties such as the choice of a parameter that sets the trade-o between t and sparsity. Two Lasso-based treatment e ect estimators are reviewed and compared on an empirical application, on which they perform well. This paper also illustrates the pitfalls of variable selection in a policy evaluation context.

Suggested Citation

  • Jérémy L'Hour, 2016. "Distinguishing the Confounding Factors: Policy Evaluation, High-Dimension and Variable Selection," Working Papers 2016-23, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
  • Handle: RePEc:crs:wpaper:2016-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://crest.science/RePEc/wpstorage/2016-23.pdf
    File Function: Crest working paper version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    treatment effect; variable selection; policy evaluation; semi-parametric estimation; high-dimension;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C01 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Econometrics
    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models
    • C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection
    • C55 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Large Data Sets: Modeling and Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crs:wpaper:2016-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crestfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.