IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crr/slpbrf/ibslp48.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How Big a Burden Are State and Local OPEB Benefits?

Author

Listed:
  • Alicia H. Munnell
  • Jean-Pierre Aubry
  • Caroline V. Crawford

Abstract

In addition to pensions, most state and local governments provide other post-employment benefits (OPEBs), the largest of which is retiree health insurance. Retiree health plans have received increased attention in recent years due to rapidly ris ing health costs and new reporting guidelines from the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). These guidelines, which were released in 2004 and became effective in 2007, require states and localities to change the way they account for the cost of retiree health plans from a cash to an accrual basis, essentially applying to OPEB plans the standards used for pensions. This brief provides an updated accounting of OPEB commitments, with data for 2012 or 2013. These data cover virtually all OPEB plans administered at the state level as well as a large sample of plans administered by counties, cities, and school districts. The analysis also looks beyond the sample of local governments to estimate aggregate OPEB liabilities for all local governments excluded from our sample. The discussion proceeds as follows. The first section describes the evolution of the new reporting framework. The second section discusses the OPEB sample and introduces our methodology for capturing OPEB liabilities for entities not in our sample. The th ird section compares OPEB and pension liabilities in the aggregate and discusses the need to use the same discount rate when comparing these liabilities. The fourth section puts the OPEB liabilities in perspective. The final section concludes that: 1) a ggregate unfunded OPEB liabilities are estimated to be $862 billion – nearly two thirds of which is held at the local level; 2) these liabilities are equivalent to 28 percent of unfunded pension liabilities – when pension liabilities are calculated with an interest rate comparable to OPEBs; and 3) while OPEB liabilities are large, several factors limit their potential drain on state and local resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Alicia H. Munnell & Jean-Pierre Aubry & Caroline V. Crawford, 2016. "How Big a Burden Are State and Local OPEB Benefits?," State and Local Pension Plans Briefs ibslp48, Center for Retirement Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:crr:slpbrf:ibslp48
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://crr.bc.edu/briefs/how-big-a-burden-are-state-and-local-opeb-benefits/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alicia H. Munnell & Jean-Pierre Aubry, 2016. "An Overview of the Pension/OPEB Landscape," Working Papers, Center for Retirement Research at Boston College wp2016-11, Center for Retirement Research.
    2. Butler, Alexander W. & Yi, Hanyi, 2022. "Aging and public financing costs: Evidence from U.S. municipal bond markets," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    3. Alicia H. Munnell & Jean-Pierre Aubry, 2016. "Will Pensions and OPEBs Break State and Local Budgets?," Issues in Brief ibslp51, Center for Retirement Research.
    4. John A. Dove & Courtney A. Collins & Daniel J. Smith, 2018. "The impact of public pension board of trustee composition on state bond ratings," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 51-73, February.
    5. Alicia H. Munnell & Jean-Pierre Aubry, 2016. "Will Pensions and OPEBs Break State and Local Budgets?," State and Local Pension Plans Briefs ibslp51, Center for Retirement Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:slpbrf:ibslp48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amy Grzybowski or Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crrbcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.