IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crr/issbrf/ib2019-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Modernizing Social Security: Minimum Benefits

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew D. Eschtruth
  • Alicia H. Munnell

Abstract

Social Security offers a minimum benefit to retired workers with very low career earnings. However, the current level of this benefit is not enough, by itself, to prevent poverty even for full-career workers, and it is withering away due to a design flaw. As a result, many policy experts support redesigning the minimum benefit. Virtually all experts agree that full-career workers should get a benefit that keeps them out of poverty. Some also support broadening eligibility for the minimum benefit by reducing the earnings level needed to build up qualifying credits. Others would take the opposite tack, narrowing eligibility by raising the number of years needed for a full or partial benefit. This brief is the final one in a series on modernizing Social Security to account for changing social, economic, and demographic circumstances. The discussion proceeds as follows. The first section provides the basics on Social Security benefits for low earners. The second section introduces the key design elements of the current minimum benefit. The third section reviews several reform proposals. The fourth section assesses the reforms based on three criteria: targeting efficiency, administrative feasibility, and cost offsets. The final section concludes that an enhanced minimum benefit has wide appeal and could substantially reduce poverty risk, with the breadth of the impact dependent on how eligibility is determined.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew D. Eschtruth & Alicia H. Munnell, 2019. "Modernizing Social Security: Minimum Benefits," Issues in Brief ib2019-2, Center for Retirement Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2019-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://crr.bc.edu/briefs/modernizing-social-security-minimum-benefits/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2019-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amy Grzybowski or Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crrbcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.