IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crr/issbrf/ib2018-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How Have Workers Responded to Oregon’s Auto-IRA?

Author

Listed:
  • Anek Belbase
  • Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher

Abstract

Only about half of private sector workers are covered by employer-sponsored retirement savings plans at any given time, and few workers save without one. The net result is that roughly a third of retired households end up solely reliant on Social Security benefits, which were never intended to be their only source of income. In the absence of federal action to close the coverage gap, some states have passed legislation to implement auto-IRAs, which require employers who do not offer a retirement plan to automatically enroll their workers in an IRA-based saving program sponsored by the state. The primary goal of auto-IRAs is to improve retirement security among uncovered workers, who would automatically start to build assets through the program. In practice, the extent to which workers benefit will depend on how they respond – workers who do not opt out, save at a meaningful rate, and avoid raiding their nest egg before retirement for non-essential expenses will improve their odds. But those who opt out of the program, or participate but do not use the program to improve their overall financial situation, will not be better prepared for retirement. Therefore, to assess the overall impact of an auto-IRA, one would need comprehensive financial data for a household, including debt, income, and saving over a long period of time. But an early look can still be useful, so this brief examines the experience of Oregon to date, which recently became the first state to implement an auto-IRA program (called OregonSaves). The goal is to answer a limited question: how do workers who gain access to an auto-IRA initially interact with the program? The discussion proceeds as follows. The first section provides background on OregonSaves’ goals, design, and implementation. The second section describes the data used in the analysis. The third section discusses the initial results emerging from the early data. The final section concludes that the majority of eligible workers do participate and tend to stick with the default deferral rate. As more data become available, both on new participants and on current participants’ longer-term behavior, researchers should be able to assess the impact of OregonSaves on the overall financial status of participating households.

Suggested Citation

  • Anek Belbase & Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher, 2018. "How Have Workers Responded to Oregon’s Auto-IRA?," Issues in Brief ib2018-22, Center for Retirement Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2018-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://crr.bc.edu/briefs/how-have-workers-responded-to-oregons-auto-ira/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John Chalmers & Olivia S. Mitchell & Jonathan Reuter & Mingli Zhong, 2021. "Auto-Enrollment Retirement Plans in OregonSaves," Working Papers wp425, University of Michigan, Michigan Retirement Research Center.
    2. John Chalmers & Olivia S. Mitchell & Jonathan Reuter & Mingli Zhong, 2021. "Auto-Enrollment Retirement Plans for the People: Choices and Outcomes in OregonSaves," NBER Working Papers 28469, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2018-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amy Grzybowski or Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crrbcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.