IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crr/crrwps/wp2022-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Did the Stimulus Checks Improve Household Balance Sheets?

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew G. Biggs
  • Anqi Chen
  • Alicia H. Munnell

Abstract

Even before COVID-19 brought the economy to a halt, about 40 percent of U.S. households said they lived on such tight budgets that they could not easily smooth small financial shocks. The question is how the pandemic affected the finances of these vulnerable households. On one hand, the shutdown of the economy resulted in salary cuts and job losses that put pressure on many households, leaving them even less prepared for small expenditure shocks. On the other hand, most households received Economic Impact Payments (EIP) totaling several thousand dollars; and those who lost their jobs got expanded Unemployment Insurance (UI) benefits that often more than replaced lost income, at least initially. In addition to preventing economic hardship, the hope was that this financial assistance would improve household balance sheets, enabling them to better weather financial shocks and avoid falling short on longer-term goals such as retirement savings.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew G. Biggs & Anqi Chen & Alicia H. Munnell, 2022. "Did the Stimulus Checks Improve Household Balance Sheets?," Working Papers, Center for Retirement Research at Boston College wp2022-14, Center for Retirement Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:crr:crrwps:wp2022-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://crr.bc.edu/working-papers/did-the-stimulus-checks-improve-household-balance-sheets/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:crrwps:wp2022-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amy Grzybowski or Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crrbcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.