IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crr/crrwps/wp2021-04.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Will Women Catch Up to Their Fertility Expectations?

Author

Listed:
  • Nilufer Gok
  • Anqi Chen

Abstract

In 2019, the Total Fertility Rate (TFR) dipped to 1.71 children per woman, an all-time low and far below the replacement rate of 2.10 children. Current levels of low fertility have important implications for the economy. To assess fertility trends, demographers often look at fertility expectations. Using this metric suggests no cause for concern. Women in their early 30s today, when first asked about their childbearing expectations in their early 20s, expected to have more than two children, similar to previous cohorts. But todayÕs 30-year-olds are much further from their 20-24 expectations than previous cohorts. And a number of trends have emerged in recent years that could suggest lower fertility. This project aims to shed light on whether women are likely to catch up to their fertility expectations and what factors influence their ability to do so. The analysis uses a regression framework to examine factors that drive fertility after age 30 for an older cohort of women surveyed in the NLSY79. The results are then used to predict the completed fertility for the younger cohort of women surveyed in the NLSY97, who are in their early- to mid-30s and still in their childbearing years. The paper found that: - Fertility expectations are the primary driver of achieved fertility for non-college graduates. - For college-educated women, other factors such as religion, marital status, and career length affect whether they achieve their fertility expectations. - Women in the NLSY97 (born in 1980-1984) are projected to have a total of 1.96 children. - This means that the gap between childbearing expectations in their early 20s and completed fertility will increase to 0.48, much higher than historical averages of 0.30. The policy implications of the findings are: - While the results seem to suggest that the current 1.71 TFR is capturing tempo effects from delayed childbearing, long-run fertility may be lower than 1.96 for several reasons. -- The results are based on the 1980-1984 cohort, but younger cohorts may have fewer children because they have lower fertility expectations and face more economic uncertainty. -- The gap might also grow since COVID-19 is likely to place downward pressure on fertility, both for the cohort studied and for younger women. - Therefore, while the current 1.71 TFR may reflect delayed fertility, actual completed fertility, especially for younger cohorts, might be lower than 1.96.

Suggested Citation

  • Nilufer Gok & Anqi Chen, 2021. "Will Women Catch Up to Their Fertility Expectations?," Working Papers, Center for Retirement Research at Boston College 2021-04, Center for Retirement Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:crr:crrwps:wp2021-04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://crr.bc.edu/working-papers/will-women-catch-up-to-their-fertility-expectations/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:crrwps:wp2021-04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amy Grzybowski or Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crrbcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.