IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crr/crrwps/wp2016-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Impact of Massachusetts Health Insurance Reform on Labor Mobility

Author

Listed:
  • Norma B. Coe
  • Wenliang Hou
  • Alicia H. Munnell
  • Patrick J. Purcell
  • Matthew S. Rutledge

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of the Massachusetts Health Insurance reform of 2016 on job mobility and employment exit using administrative data from the Social Security Administration. The Massachusetts reform mandated that every resident have insurance coverage and facilitated this initiative by requiring employers to offer coverage, as well as expanding Medicaid and creating health insurance exchanges with subsidized premiums. These elements provided the basis for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) passed nationwide in 2010, so the experience of workers in Massachusetts provides evidence for how the ACA may affect labor market efficiency. Of particular interest is the extent to which Massachusetts’ reform reduced “job lock” – the phenomenon in which workers stay with employers to maintain their health insurance coverage, rather than move to a more productive match at another employer (especially a small firm unlikely to offer coverage) or exit employment entirely. The project measures differential effects by age, gender, and firm size, and tries to disentangle the effects of the employer mandate and the individual mandate by identifying individuals who cross state lines between home and work.

Suggested Citation

  • Norma B. Coe & Wenliang Hou & Alicia H. Munnell & Patrick J. Purcell & Matthew S. Rutledge, 2016. "The Impact of Massachusetts Health Insurance Reform on Labor Mobility," Working Papers, Center for Retirement Research at Boston College wp2016-16, Center for Retirement Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:crr:crrwps:wp2016-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://crr.bc.edu/working-papers/the-impact-of-massachusetts-health-insurance-reform-on-labor-mobility/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:crrwps:wp2016-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amy Grzybowski or Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crrbcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.