IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/36.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Macroeconomic Policy Design and Control Theory - A Failed Partnership?

Author

Listed:
  • Currie, David

Abstract

This paper provides a general review of recent developments in the application of control theory to macroeconomic policy design. It starts by highlighting the crucial difference between the engineering and economic control problem, in that the latter, unlike the former, is concerned with the control of intelligent systems. It examines the problems that this creates for macroeconomic policy formulation, and considers the usefulness of the rational expectations assumption in this context. Policy formulation is then analysed in the context of an interdependent world, and the dangers of single country policy optimisation are highlighted. It is argued that the most pressing issue is that of formulating appropriate rules, supported by penalty strategies, for the orderly conduct of macroeconomic policy in an international setting. The paper concludes by examining the conduct of United Kingdom macropolicy over the past five years, arguing that greater attention to issues of macropolicy design would have avoided some serious deficiencies in the conduct of policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Currie, David, 1984. "Macroeconomic Policy Design and Control Theory - A Failed Partnership?," CEPR Discussion Papers 36, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=36
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.