IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/18046.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Global Gains From a Green Energy Transition: Evidence on Coal-Fired Power and Air Quality Dissatisfaction

Author

Listed:
  • Besley, Tim
  • Hussain, Azhar

Abstract

Phasing out coal-fired power in favor of renewables is now a central plank of climate action. But, in contrast to many other policy actions, coal-fired power should have an immediate and perceptible benefit through improved air quality. If this is true, there is potential to harness local politics in combating a global problem. However, this line of argument is only valid if coal-fired power does indeed lead to greater air quality dissatisfaction. This paper provides such evidence using geocoded survey data from 51 countries by demonstrating that people living within 40 km of coal-fired power stations are, on average, more dissatisfied with the ambient air quality. We then construct a willingness-to-pay measure to show that there are net benefits from replacing coal-fired power generation capacity with green technologies globally, solely based on air quality improvements.

Suggested Citation

  • Besley, Tim & Hussain, Azhar, 2023. "Global Gains From a Green Energy Transition: Evidence on Coal-Fired Power and Air Quality Dissatisfaction," CEPR Discussion Papers 18046, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:18046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP18046
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:18046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.