IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/17499.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measuring Valuation of Liquidity with Penalized Withdrawals

Author

Listed:
  • Porzio, Tommaso
  • Coyne, David
  • Fadlon, Itzik

Abstract

We propose using penalized withdrawals from retirement savings accounts, identified from U.S. tax records, as a revealed-preference tool to analyze households’ valuation of liquidity. A simple dynamic model formalizes the notion that the prevalence of withdrawals can be used to characterize American households’ valuation of liquidity over time and space. Over time, we find that declines in household income lead to sudden, large, and persistent jumps in the probability of penalized withdrawals, providing evidence that shocks are imperfectly insured and that households have high valuation of liquidity. Across space, we show that both local economic conditions and persistent household characteristics play an important role, with the average valuation of liquid- ity being higher in financially underdeveloped areas as well as in black communities, consistent with them being marginalized from the credit market. Applying our tool to the Great Recession, we further find that more affected areas saw larger increases in penalized withdrawals, likely driven by tightening of local credit conditions. Overall, our analysis offers a new tool to study the valuation of liquidity, and our results point to sizable welfare gains from social insurance policies targeted at both households and locations over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Porzio, Tommaso & Coyne, David & Fadlon, Itzik, 2022. "Measuring Valuation of Liquidity with Penalized Withdrawals," CEPR Discussion Papers 17499, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:17499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP17499
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:17499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.