IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cnz/wpaper/872016.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

(English) Report about communication between researchers and stakeholders: a case study in the agrifood sector (Italiano) Rapporto sulla comunicazione tra ricercatori e stakeholder: un caso di studio nel settore agro

Author

Listed:
  • Valentina Tudisca

Abstract

(English) Aim of this study was to gather the point of view of researchers of the National Research Council of Italy and stakeholders who work in the agrifood field collaborating with them on science communication. By means of two questionnaires addressed respectively to researchers and stakeholders, respondents let emerge a picture of science communication in the agrifood field in Italy. Among the insights obtained: the interest in communication between researchers and stakeholders, most of which were farmers and administrators, is reciprocal and no problems in understanding people from other sectors are declared; both researchers and stakeholders would like to communicate more also with politicians; the main ways of acquiring research results by stakeholders is participation to collective events like conferences and individual contacts with researchers. Moreover stakeholders suggest some proposal to improve communication of research, which are summarized in the report. (Italiano) Il rapporto presenta i risultati di un’indagine realizzata nell’ambito del progetto premiale Gestione sostenibile della risorsa acqua in agricoltura - AQUA del Dipartimento Scienze Bio-Agroalimentari del CNR, che si è svolto tra ottobre 2014 e ottobre 2015. L’obiettivo dello studio è stato acquisire il punto di vista dei ricercatori del progetto e degli stakeholder con cui collaborano, soprattutto aziende agricole e amministratori, rispetto alla comunicazione della ricerca. Tra i risultati emersi da due questionari somministrati alle due categorie: l’interesse alla comunicazione è reciproco e non si riscontrano problemi di comunicazione tra settori diversi; entrambe le parti vorrebbero comunicare di più con i politici; gli stakeholder acquisiscono i risultati di ricerca soprattutto tramite eventi collettivi come conferenze o contatti individuali con i ricercatori. Gli stakeholder hanno inoltre proposto alcune soluzioni per migliorare la comunicazione con il mondo della ricerca.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentina Tudisca, 2016. "(English) Report about communication between researchers and stakeholders: a case study in the agrifood sector (Italiano) Rapporto sulla comunicazione tra ricercatori e stakeholder: un caso di studio ," IRPPS Working Papers 87:2016, National Research Council, Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies.
    • Handle: RePEc:cnz:wpaper:87:2016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.irpps.cnr.it/e-pub/ojs/files/journals/4/articles/184/public/184-602-1-PB.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mackinson, S. & Wilson, D.C. & Galiay, P. & Deas, B., 2011. "Engaging stakeholders in fisheries and marine research," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 18-24, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tim S. Gray & Thomas L. Catchpole, 2021. "The Relation between Fisheries–Science Partnerships and Co-Management: A Case Study of EU Discards Survival Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Alabsi, Natheer & Komatsu, Teruhisa, 2014. "Characterization of fisheries management in Yemen: A case study of a developing country׳s management regime," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PA), pages 89-95.
    3. Livia Fritz & Claudia R. Binder, 2018. "Participation as Relational Space: A Critical Approach to Analysing Participation in Sustainability Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-29, August.
    4. Hyder, Kieran & Townhill, Bryony & Anderson, Lucy G. & Delany, Jane & Pinnegar, John K., 2015. "Can citizen science contribute to the evidence-base that underpins marine policy?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 112-120.
    5. Dentoni, Domenico & Klerkx, Laurens, 2015. "Co-managing public research in Australian fisheries through convergence–divergence processes," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 259-271.
    6. Santiago, Jose L. & Ballesteros, Marta A. & Chapela, Rosa & Silva, Cristina & Nielsen, Kåre N. & Rangel, Mafalda & Erzini, Karim & Wise, Laura & Campos, Aida & Borges, Maria F. & Sala, Antonello & Vir, 2015. "Is Europe ready for a results-based approach to fisheries management? The voice of stakeholders," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 86-97.
    7. Melaku Canu, Donata & Solidoro, Cosimo, 2014. "Socio-economic analysis and stakeholder involvement: Mussel-farming in the Gulf of Trieste," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 55-62.
    8. Jessica L Couture & Rachael E Blake & Gavin McDonald & Colette L Ward, 2018. "A funder-imposed data publication requirement seldom inspired data sharing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-13, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cnz:wpaper:87:2016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sveva Avveduto (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/irppsit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.