IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cnc/wpaper/01-1998.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evidencia Empírica de Dualidad en Valoración Contingente con Formato Binario

Author

Listed:
  • Felipe Vásquez

    (Departamento de Economía, Universidad de Concepción)

  • Arcadio Cerda
  • Sergio Orrego

Abstract

El artículo presenta la comparación de las medidas de bienestar, obtenidas mediante dos interpretaciones teóricas para el método de valoración contingente (VC) con formato binario. En primer lugar se discute el enfoque de diferencia de la función de utilidad indirecta. Posteriormente se desarrolla la alternativa conocida como función de variación. Se estiman dos formas funcionales (lineal y logarítmica) para cada estructura teórica, y se calculan las respectivas medias y medianas como medidas de bienestar. Para estimar sus varianzas, se utiliza un procedimiento de simulación que genera una distribución empírica de las medidas de bienestar para la definición de los intervalos de confianza. Alternativamente se utiliza el método delta, el cual aproxima lineal mente las medidas de bienestar usando la expansión de la serie de Taylor de primer orden.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Felipe Vásquez & Arcadio Cerda & Sergio Orrego, 1998. "Evidencia Empírica de Dualidad en Valoración Contingente con Formato Binario," Working Papers 01-1998, Departamento de Economía, Universidad de Concepción.
  • Handle: RePEc:cnc:wpaper:01-1998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://educacion.facea.udec.cl/economia/?q=node/113
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cnc:wpaper:01-1998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ronald Sepulveda (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deudecl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.