Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Deceptive data? The New Survey of London Life and Labour 1928 – 31

Contents:

Author Info

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    This paper examines the New Survey of London Life and Labour, a social survey conducted within Greater London in the late 1920s and early 1930s. Relatively unknown compared to Charles Booth’s more famous survey of London some forty years before, the New Survey is perhaps the most detailed study of the lives of everyday Londoners in the inter-war period. This paper explains the background of the New Survey and examines the processes that were used to collect household information. It then examines how reliable the data is, especially given that doubts have been raised over the conduct of one interviewer in particular, who was responsible for collecting almost a fifth of the total information.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.econsoc.hist.cam.ac.uk/docs/CWPESH_number_16_Oct_2013.pdf
    File Function: None.
    Download Restriction: None.

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Department of Economic and Social History at the University of Cambridge in its series Working Papers with number 16.

    as in new window
    Length: 8,510 words
    Date of creation: 10 Sep 2013
    Date of revision:
    Publication status: Published in Cambridge Working Paper in Economic & Social History, No. 16
    Handle: RePEc:cmh:wpaper:16

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.econsoc.hist.cam.ac.uk/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: New Survey of London Life and Labour; Life and Labour of the people in London; Greater London; Social Survey; inter-war; Arthur Lyon Bowley; Hubert Llewellyn Smith.;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmh:wpaper:16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Amy Price).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.