IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cir/cirpro/2022rp-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Baromètre de la confiance des consommateurs québécois à l’égard des aliments -2e édition - Édition complète

Author

Listed:
  • Nathalie de Marcellis-Warin
  • Ingrid Peignier

Abstract

The Quebec government's Biofood Policy places consumer expectations and health at the heart of its priorities for the coming years. Offering products that meet consumers' needs is one of the main orientations defined to achieve the ambitions and targets of this policy. In this context, CIRANO's Barometer of Quebec consumers' confidence in food is an important and very useful tool for decision making for the government, but also for all stakeholders in the bio-food sector. Conducted on a regular basis, the Barometer makes it possible to identify trends and take into account the changing context in which Quebecers make food choices. As was the case with the first edition in 2019, the 2021 Barometer provides rich, timely and unprecedented information on a range of issues related to the level of consumer confidence in food. It also identifies priority actions for the government, including levers to increase the consumption of organic or Quebec foods, tackle food waste, or encourage responsible business practices such as animal welfare or respect for the environment. This second edition of the Barometer is based on a survey administered from February 8 to 11, 2021 to a representative sample of 1005 people. The report presents very detailed descriptive statistics, but also the results of multivariate analyses and statistical tests to determine whether the results vary significantly according to certain socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents, such as gender, age, region of residence and income. La Politique bioalimentaire du gouvernement du Québec place les attentes des consommateurs et leur santé au cœur des priorités pour les prochaines années. Offrir des produits répondants aux besoins des consommateurs figure parmi les principales orientations définies pour atteindre les ambitions et les cibles de cette politique. Dans ce contexte, le Baromètre de la confiance des consommateurs québécois à l’égard des aliments du CIRANO est un outil important et très utile à la prise de décisions pour le gouvernement, mais aussi pour l’ensemble des parties prenantes du secteur bioalimentaire. Réalisé sur une base régulière, le Baromètre permet de bien cerner les tendances et de tenir compte de l’évolution du contexte dans lequel les Québécoises et Québécois font des choix en matière d’alimentation. Comme c’était le cas de la première édition en 2019, le Baromètre de 2021 fournit des informations riches, opportunes et inédites sur un ensemble d’enjeux reliés au niveau de confiance des consommateurs à l’égard des aliments. Il permet aussi d’identifier des actions à privilégier pour le gouvernement, incluant des leviers pour augmenter la consommation d’aliments biologiques ou d’aliments du Québec, s’attaquer au gaspillage alimentaire ou encore encourager les pratiques d’affaires responsables comme le bienêtre animal ou le respect de l’environnement. Cette deuxième édition du Baromètre est fondée sur une enquête administrée du 8 au 11 février 2021 auprès d’un échantillon représentatif de 1005 personnes. Le rapport présente des statistiques descriptives très détaillées, mais aussi les résultats d’analyses multivariées et tests statistiques afin de déterminer si les résultats varient significativement en fonction de certaines caractéristiques sociodémographiques des personnes interrogées comme le sexe, l’âge, la région de résidence, le revenu.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathalie de Marcellis-Warin & Ingrid Peignier, 2022. "Baromètre de la confiance des consommateurs québécois à l’égard des aliments -2e édition - Édition complète," CIRANO Project Reports 2022rp-18, CIRANO.
  • Handle: RePEc:cir:cirpro:2022rp-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/2022RP-18.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Haziza & Jean‐François Beaumont, 2007. "On the Construction of Imputation Classes in Surveys," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 75(1), pages 25-43, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nathalie de Marcellis-Warin & Ingrid Peignier, 2021. "Perception des risques au Québec - Baromètre CIRANO 2021," CIRANO Papers 2021li-01, CIRANO.
    2. Lidia Ceriani & Vladimir Hlasny & Paolo Verme, 2021. "Bottom Incomes and the Measurement of Poverty: A Brief Assessment of the Literature," Working Papers 589, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    3. Jin-Ling Yan & Yong-Jie Xue & Muhammad Mohsin, 2022. "Accessing Occupational Health Risks Posed by Fishermen Based on Fuzzy AHP and IPA Methods: Management and Performance Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Helene Boistard & Guillaume Chauvet & David Haziza, 2016. "Doubly Robust Inference for the Distribution Function in the Presence of Missing Survey Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(3), pages 683-699, September.
    5. Nathalie de Marcellis-Warin & Ingrid Peignier & Thomas Gleize, 2023. "Baromètre de la confiance des consommateurs québécois à l’égard des aliments -3e édition," CIRANO Project Reports 2023rp-09, CIRANO.
    6. Heng Chen & Marie-Hélène Felt & Christopher Henry, 2018. "2017 Methods-of-Payment Survey: Sample Calibration and Variance Estimation," Technical Reports 114, Bank of Canada.
    7. West Brady T. & Sakshaug Joseph W. & Aurelien Guy Alain S., 2018. "Accounting for Complex Sampling in Survey Estimation: A Review of Current Software Tools," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 34(3), pages 721-752, September.
    8. Vladimir Hlasny & Lidia Ceriani & Paolo Verme, 2022. "Bottom Incomes and the Measurement of Poverty and Inequality," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 68(4), pages 970-1006, December.
    9. Rebecca R. Andridge & Roderick J. A. Little, 2010. "A Review of Hot Deck Imputation for Survey Non‐response," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 78(1), pages 40-64, April.
    10. Osier, Guillaume, 2016. "Unit non-response in household wealth surveys," Statistics Paper Series 15, European Central Bank.
    11. Yves G. Berger & Emilio L. Escobar, 2017. "Variance Estimation of Imputed Estimators of Change for Repeated Rotating Surveys," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 85(3), pages 421-438, December.
    12. Rebecca Andridge & Katherine Jenny Thompson, 2015. "Using the Fraction of Missing Information to Identify Auxiliary Variables for Imputation Procedures via Proxy Pattern-mixture Models," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 83(3), pages 472-492, December.
    13. Yves G. Berger, 2020. "An empirical likelihood approach under cluster sampling with missing observations," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(1), pages 91-121, February.
    14. Wayne A. Fuller, 2022. "Post‐strata based on sample quantiles," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(4), pages 1504-1521, October.
    15. Encarnación Álvarez-Verdejo & Pablo J. Moya-Fernández & Juan F. Muñoz-Rosas, 2021. "Single Imputation Methods and Confidence Intervals for the Gini Index," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(24), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cir:cirpro:2022rp-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciranca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.