This paper reviews studies providing evidence of the cost-effectiveness of safe motherhood interventions in low-income countries. The economic case for investing in safe motherhood interventions is also examined. It is estimated that 1,600 women die globally each day as a result of problems during pregnancy or childbirth. A large proportion of these deaths is preventable. According to the World Bank, antenatal and maternal services comprise two of the six most cost-effective sets of health nterventions in low-income countries. Due to the problem of linking programme interventions with outcomes however, few cost-effectiveness studies currently exist. Despite this certain interventions are more cost-effective than others, such as substituting manual vacuum aspiration for dilatation and curettage when dealing with incomplete abortion. It is estimated that 26% of maternal deaths are avoidable through antenatal/community-based interventions, costing around 30% of the World Health Organisation’s Mother Baby Package. Ensuring access to high quality essential obstetric care can prevent a further 58% of maternal deaths, consuming 24% of total Mother Baby Package costs. Current evidence suggests that targeting investments on essential obstetric services would reap the greatest efficiency gains.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Centre for Health Economics, University of York in its series Working Papers with number
181chedp.