Maria Goddard () (Centre for Health Economics, The University of York) Russell Mannion Peter Smith () (Centre for Health Economics, The University of York)
Additional information is available for the following
registered author(s):
The provision of quantitative information has been given a key role in securing good performance in the new NHS. A new National Performance Framework has been proposed encompassing a number of dimensions of performance. Whilst this approach to managing the NHS is welcomed, it is essential to understand the strengths and limitations intrinsic to the use of performance indicators for this purpose. In particular, complex behavioural consequences may arise in response to the collection and dissemination of performance data, some of which may be unintended, potentially dysfunctional and damaging for the NHS. Results from a recent study on the performance of NHS Trusts are used to illustrate the sort of unintended side-effects which occur within the current system and which may in principle be replicated in the new system in future. Whilst the possibility of such consequences does not invalidate the potential of the new Performance Framework to secure the desired changes in the NHS, it does suggest that careful attention needs to be paid to the assessment of unanticipated side-effects.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Centre for Health Economics, University of York in its series Working Papers with number
158chedp.