IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/chu/wpaper/24-05.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cognitive Abilities and Individual Earnings in Hybrid Continuous Double Auctions

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Peng

    (Xiamen University)

  • Jason Shachat

    (Durham University Business School, Wuhan Unviversity, Chapman University)

  • Lijia Wei

    (Wuhan University)

  • S. Sarah Zhang

    (University of Manchester)

Abstract

We study the influence of cognitive abilities, in particular reaction time, trader intuition (Theory of Mind), and cognitive reflection abilities, on human participants’ individual earnings when competing alongside algorithmic traders in continuous double auctions. In balanced markets, where each human trader has an algorithmic trader clone with the same valuations or costs, faster human reaction time significantly improves trading performance, while Theory of Mind can be detrimental to human trading performance, particularly for sellers. For unbalanced markets with humans and algorithmic traders on opposite sides of the market, the effects of cognitive abilities depend on trader role as well as agent presence and speed, highlighting the influence of market balance and agent presence and speed on trading success and earnings.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Peng & Jason Shachat & Lijia Wei & S. Sarah Zhang, 2024. "Cognitive Abilities and Individual Earnings in Hybrid Continuous Double Auctions," Working Papers 24-05, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:chu:wpaper:24-05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/esi_working_papers/401/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Trading agents; Cognitive abilities; Algorithmic trading; Laboratory experiment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C78 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
    • C92 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Group Behavior
    • D40 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chu:wpaper:24-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Megan Luetje (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esichus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.