IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/chu/wpaper/20-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Menu-Dependent Food Choices and Food Waste

Author

Listed:
  • Hongxing Liu

    (Department of Economics, Lafayette College)

  • Joaquín Gómez-Miñambres

    (Department of Economics, Lafayette College
    Economic Science Institute, Chapman University)

  • Danyi Qi

    (Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University)

Abstract

We use a combination of randomized field experiments and online surveys to test how the menu design affects food choices and food waste. In our field experiment, participants face one of two menus a narrow menu that only displays a small portion of food, or a broad menu that also contains bigger portions. While all options are equally available in both menus, they differ in how easy and fast the different choices can be made. Our results show that, compared to the broad menu, participants in the narrow menu ordered smaller portions of food. Importantly, food intake was similar across conditions, leading to significant food waste reduction under the narrow menu. Our online survey suggest that these results are consistent with a combination of anchoring and menu-dependent self-control theories. We discuss the implication of our results to menu design in real world settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongxing Liu & Joaquín Gómez-Miñambres & Danyi Qi, 2020. "Menu-Dependent Food Choices and Food Waste," Working Papers 20-37, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:chu:wpaper:20-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/esi_working_papers/332/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    food waste; food choice; menu design; nudge; anchoring; self-control;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chu:wpaper:20-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Megan Luetje (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esichus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.