IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/chu/wpaper/20-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does free information provision crowd out costly information acquisition? It’s a matter of timing

Author

Listed:
  • Diego Aycinena

    (Department of Economics, Universidad del Rosario
    Economic Science Institute, Chapman University)

  • Alexander Elbittar

    (Department of Economics, CIDE)

  • Andrei Gomberg

    (Department of Economics, ITAM
    gomberg@itam.mx)

  • Lucas Rentschler

    (Utah State University
    lucas.rentschler@usu.edu)

Abstract

Conventional wisdom suggests that promising an agent free information would crowd out costly information acquisition. We theoretically demonstrate that this intuition only holds as a knife-edge case where priors are symmetric. For asymmetric priors, agents are predicted to increase their information acquisition when promised free information in the future. We test in the lab whether such crowding out occurs for both symmetric and asymmetric priors. We find theoretical support for the predictions: when priors are asymmetric, the promise of future “free†information induces subjects to acquire costly information which they would not be acquiring otherwise.

Suggested Citation

  • Diego Aycinena & Alexander Elbittar & Andrei Gomberg & Lucas Rentschler, 2020. "Does free information provision crowd out costly information acquisition? It’s a matter of timing," Working Papers 20-26, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:chu:wpaper:20-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/esi_working_papers/321/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Information Acquisition; Rational Ignorance; Experiments;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • C90 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - General
    • D44 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Auctions
    • D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chu:wpaper:20-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Megan Luetje (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esichus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.