IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/chu/wpaper/19-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Public Leaderboard Feedback in Sampling Competition: An Experimental Investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Stanton Hudja

    (Purdue University)

  • Brian Roberson

    (Purdue University)

  • Yaroslav Rosokha

    (Purdue University)

Abstract

We investigate the role of performance feedback, in the form of a public leaderboard, in a sequential-sampling contest with costly observations. The player whose sequential random sample contains the observation with the highest value wins the contest and obtains a prize with a fixed value. We find that there exist parameter configurations such that in the subgame perfect equilibrium of contests with a fixed ending date (i.e., finite horizon), providing public performance feedback results in fewer expected observations and a lower expected value of the winning observation. We conduct a controlled laboratory experiment to test the theoretical predictions, and find that the experimental results largely support the theory. In addition, we investigate how individual characteristics affect competitive sequential-sampling activity. We find that risk aversion is a significant predictor of behavior both with and without leaderboard feedback, and that the direction of this effect is consistent with the theoretical predictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Stanton Hudja & Brian Roberson & Yaroslav Rosokha, 2019. "Public Leaderboard Feedback in Sampling Competition: An Experimental Investigation," Working Papers 19-34, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:chu:wpaper:19-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/esi_working_papers/299/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Innovation Competitions; Experiments; Contests;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D90 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - General
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • C90 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - General
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chu:wpaper:19-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Megan Luetje (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esichus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.