Hedge fund alphas: do they reflect managerial skills or mere compensation for liquidity risk bearing?
AbstractIn this article, we study the effect of liquidity risk on the performance of various hedge fund portfolio strategies. The portfolio strategies in each hedge fund style are formed by incorporating predictability in: (i) managerial skills, (ii) fund risk loadings, and (iii) benchmark returns. As in Avramov et al. (2007), we find that, before taking into account the effect of liquidity risk, long-only constrained hedge fund style portfolios that incorporate predictability in managerial skills generate superior performance. However, the outperformance disappears or weakens dramatically for seven out of ten types of hedge fund style portfolios once the effect of liquidity risk is incorporated into the performance evaluation framework. Hence, for most hedge fund style-based portfolio strategies, “alphas” to a large extend reflect mere compensation for liquidity risk bearing. These results are robust to: (i) an alternative performance evaluation model (ii) an alternative liquidity risk proxy, (iii) the exclusion of the January effect on the liquidity premium and (iv) the exclusion of the recent financial crises data.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Swiss Finance Institute in its series Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series with number 08-37.
Length: 45 pages
Date of creation:
Date of revision:
Hedge Funds; Liquidity Risk; Managerial Skills; Predictability.;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
- G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
- G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marilyn Barja).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.