Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Quel critère d’évaluation pour les méthodes d’évaluation environnementale ; une application au risque d’inondation

Contents:

Author Info

  • Marc Sassi

    (CERGAM-CAE, Aix-Marseille Université)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    L’objectif général de cet article est d’apporter une approche originale de comparaison entre quatre différentes méthodes d’évaluation environnementale potentiellement applicables au cas du risque d’inondation. Ces méthodes maintenant couramment employées s’avèrent particulièrement utiles à l’estimation des bénéfices ainsi qu’à la révélation de la valeur des biens non marchands. L’intérêt est donc d’apporter des éléments de comparaisons théoriques et empiriques entre ces différentes techniques et ainsi en évaluer un critère d’évaluation. Nous en montrerons les forces et les faiblesses dans un contexte particulier de risque naturel au regard d’un critère d’évaluation jugé pertinent.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://junon.u-3mrs.fr/afa10w21/RePEc/cgm/wpaper/DR_53_0708_Sassi.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2007
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Aix-Marseille Université, CERGAM in its series CAE Working Papers with number 53.

    as in new window
    Length: 30 pages
    Date of creation: 2007
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:cgm:wpaper:53

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Clos Guiot Puyricard - CS 30063, 13089 Aix en Provence Cedex 2
    Phone: 04 42 28 12 08
    Fax: +33 (0)4 42 28 08 00
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.univ-cae.org
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Evaluation environnementale; valeur économique; risque naturel;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cgm:wpaper:53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mathieu Bédard).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.