IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_5997.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Digital Tools and the Derailment of Iceland's New Constitution

Author

Listed:
  • Thorvaldur Gylfason
  • Anne Meuwese

Abstract

This paper maps the use of digital tools in the Icelandic constitutional revision process of 2011 and discusses its aftermath in subsequent years. Although causal links between the digital elements of the process and the content and fate of the constitutional bill are impossible to establish, an analysis of the Icelandic constitution-writing efforts as ‘digital democracy’ reveals some important lessons. High-quality input into constitution-making processes through digital participation is possible, but the very threat of this to vested institutional interests also makes consensus on and enforcement of the ‘rules of the game’ of paramount importance.

Suggested Citation

  • Thorvaldur Gylfason & Anne Meuwese, 2016. "Digital Tools and the Derailment of Iceland's New Constitution," CESifo Working Paper Series 5997, CESifo.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_5997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp5997.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thorvaldur Gylfason, 2016. "Chain of Legitimacy: Constitution Making in Iceland," CESifo Working Paper Series 6018, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    digital tools; democracy; constitutions; Iceland;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_5997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.