We examine the ability of six labour market models to account for the business cycle behaviour of UK labour markets when embedded in a stochastic growth model. WE assess the models in terms of : (i) their ability to mimic general business cycle correlations and volatility (ii) their success at explaining the persistence of labour market fluctuations and (iii) whether the models can explain why the growth and speed of adjustment of labour market variables changes between periods of expansions and contractions. The main success of the models is the ability to broadly account for business cycle correlations and co-movements and the changes in employment/unemployment growth rates between expansions and contractions. However, there are three main failures (a) the models tend to produce insufficiently volatile employment and unemployment fluctuations (b) the models tend to produce too strong a correlation between wages and employment (c) most of the models generate only brief temporary deviations in unemployment in response to shocks rather than the protracted dynamics of the data.
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Centre for Economic Performance, LSE in its series CEP Discussion Papers with number
dp0364.
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Roger E. A. Farmer & Andrew Hollenhorst, 2006.
"Shooting the Auctioneer,"
NBER Working Papers
12584, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: