IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cep/cepdps/dp0298.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Everyones A Winner?: Persistence in British Private Sector Wage Settlements

Author

Listed:
  • D Brown
  • P Ingram
  • Jonathan Wadsworth

Abstract

One important feature of labour market policy over the past 15 years has been an emphasis on promoting greater flexibility and responsiveness in wages to the fortunes of individual firms. This study analyses the patterns of persistence in British private manufacturing wage settlements using a unique longitudinal dataset of bargaining groups over the period 1979-94. We find little evidence that settlement variation in private sector manufacturing bargaining groups has widened over time. We do find that the pattern and persistence of settlements over time is consistent with the presence of autoregressive but not permanent fixed effect components. We show that this relatively small amount of turbulence is sufficient to generate evolutionary paths for wage levels, consistent with the evidence of widening inequality observed in recent years in Britain, suggesting that firm fixed effects may not account for much of the rise.

Suggested Citation

  • D Brown & P Ingram & Jonathan Wadsworth, 1996. "Everyones A Winner?: Persistence in British Private Sector Wage Settlements," CEP Discussion Papers dp0298, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
  • Handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/_new/publications/discussion-papers/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.