IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cep/cepdps/dp0162.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Failure Buy-outs and Buy-Out Failure

Author

Listed:
  • C Ennew
  • K Robbie
  • N Wilson
  • M Wright

Abstract

Management buy-outs have become an international phenomenon, yet important differences exist between countries in the nature of buy-outs. In the early 1990s, the differential impact of recession has brought two important issues to the fore. The first involves the contribution of buy-outs to restructuring failed firms and the second relates to concerns over the viability of buy-out transactions carried out in the 1980s. This paper addresses these issues as follows. First, it reviews the criteria for the development of a buy-out market; second it examines the nature and extent of buy-outs of firms in receivership; and third it examines financial factors which influence the failure of buy-outs. The analysis of the sample of buy-outs of firms in receivership show that in the 1990s such firms are more likely to be profitable subsidiaries of failed groups, to be located in the South East of England and to be in service industries. The study found that the main reasons for failure were parent related, with unwise acquisition policies being one of the most important factors. High incidences of management having alternative job opportunities and having attempted to buy the firm in advance of receivership are also identifies. Buy-outs of firms in receivership are found to engage in higher levels of restructuring that buy-puts in general. Examination of a matched sample of buy-outs which failed and those which have not finds that those which fail are significantly more likely to have high gearing ratios, low liquidity and poor labour productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • C Ennew & K Robbie & N Wilson & M Wright, 1993. "Failure Buy-outs and Buy-Out Failure," CEP Discussion Papers dp0162, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
  • Handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/_new/publications/discussion-papers/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.