IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cep/cepdps/dp0084.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Nonlinear Dynamics, Entitlement Rules and the Cyclical Behaviour of the Personal Income Distribution

Author

Listed:
  • A Brandolini

Abstract

This paper attempts to analyse, in a theoretical perspective, the effects of economic fluctuations on the personal distribution of incomes. The framework developed here is logically separated into two building blocks. The first is a macrodynammic model determining wages and profits, I.e. the functional income distribution. The second is a set of 'entitlement rules', regulating the assignment of wages and profits to people and, hence, the personal income distribution. This admittedly artificial separation has the advantage of providing an approach that can, in principle, be applied to different models of the trade cycle, and of highlighting the arbitrariness of the choice of the entitlement rules, whose main determinants are social and historical factors. This analytical framework is applied to Goodwin's growth cycle model. Changes in income distribution are examined by means of two criteria: the Lorenz dominance and the Gini coefficient. The result of this paper show that inequality is unambiguously affected by economic fluctuations only over certain phases of the business cycle, while in the other phases Lorenz curves cross. This can partly explain why empirical evidence on this issue is rather mixed. On the other hand, the loose positive relationship between inequality and unemployment confirms one of the few regularities found in empirical research.

Suggested Citation

  • A Brandolini, 1992. "Nonlinear Dynamics, Entitlement Rules and the Cyclical Behaviour of the Personal Income Distribution," CEP Discussion Papers dp0084, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
  • Handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marco Ranaldi, 2022. "Income Composition Inequality," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 68(1), pages 139-160, March.
    2. Marisa Civardi & Renata Targetti Lenti, 2018. "Can the link between functional and personal income distribution enhance the analysis of inequality?," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 65(2), pages 137-156, June.
    3. Enrica Chiappero-Martinetti, 2016. "The Space of Inequalities," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 440-446, July.
    4. Petrova, Bilyana & Ranaldi, Marco, 2021. "Determinants of Income Composition Inequality," SocArXiv vyrz7, Center for Open Science.
    5. Marisa Civardi & Renata Targetti Lenti, 2017. "Can the link between functional and personal income distribution enhance the analysis of inequality?," Working papers 55, Società Italiana di Economia Pubblica.
    6. Ravenscroft, Sue & Williams, Paul F., 2021. "Sustaining discreditable accounting research through ignorance: The mainstream elite’s response to the 2008 financial crisis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/_new/publications/discussion-papers/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.