IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cen/tnotes/23-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Medicare Savings Programs (MSPs): Eligibility and Enrollment Trends

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Wysocki
  • Matthew Niedzwiecki
  • Evelyn Cody
  • Preeti Gill

Abstract

There is a gap in our understanding about changes in eligibility and enrollment for Medicare Savings Programs (MSPs). We analyzed data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) linked to the Medicare Enrollment Database (EDB) and Medicaid Statistical Information System (MSIS) to study eligibility and enrollment trends in MSPs, particularly in the QMB, SLMB, and QI programs. We found that the MSP participation rate increased slowly and steadily for both age groups across all MSP groups. In our descriptive comparisons, we found MSP enrollees (relative to the MSP eligible-but-not-enrolled population) were more likely to be 18 to 64 years old, not married, male, a member of a racial group other than White, and Latinx. MSP-enrollees (relative to the MSP-eligible but not enrolled population) were also more likely to not have completed high school; to receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI) or Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits; to have no limitations in activities of daily living; to self-report a health status of very good, good, or fair; to not have private insurance; to use at least one prescription drug; and to be living in a state that uses the standard federal asset limits for MSP eligibility. MSP enrollees also spent more days in the hospital, had more visits to a doctor’s office, and had fewer dental visits in the past year than people who were eligible for MSPs but not enrolled. When we examined the correlation between different characteristics and MSP enrollment, controlling for all other characteristics, we found those enrolled in SSI or SNAP were more likely to be enrolled in an MSP. Specifically, SSI receipt was associated with an 8.7 percentage point increase in the likelihood of MSP enrollment, and SNAP receipt was associated with a 38.6 percentage point increase in the likelihood of MSP enrollment. We also found those who were 65 or older (-8.5 percentage points), married (-11.6 percentage points), and high school graduates (-8.9 percentage points), were less likely to be enrolled in an MSP. In our models examining the effect of MIPPA, we found no strong evidence that the implementation of MIPPA in 2010 had any meaningful impact on MSP eligibility, enrollment, or participation. In our June 8, 2023 2 of 12 cross-sectional regression models examining OOP spending, we found that MSP enrollees reported 24 percent lower total OOP spending for medical costs than their MSP-eligible-but-not-enrolled peers (p = 0.08). When we divided OOP spending into component parts, we found MSP enrollment was associated with 33 percent lower OOP spending for non-over-the-counter medical expenses (p = 0.09). Although we also found lower over-the-counter medical and premium spending among MSP enrollees, neither difference was statistically significant at the 10 percent level. We did not find any statistically significant differences for the financial well-being measures between MSP enrollees and the MSP-eligible-but-not-enrolled population after controlling for observable characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Wysocki & Matthew Niedzwiecki & Evelyn Cody & Preeti Gill, 2023. "Medicare Savings Programs (MSPs): Eligibility and Enrollment Trends," CES Technical Notes Series 23-10, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
  • Handle: RePEc:cen:tnotes:23-10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www2.census.gov/ces/tn/CES-TN-2023-10.pdf
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: CES Technical Notes may contain confidential data and, thereby, disclosure is prohibited. Researchers on approved projects (to apply for access, please see https://www.census.gov/ces/rdcresearch/howtoapply.html) with the correct permissions can request full text notes from CES.Technical.Notes.List@census.gov.

    File URL: https://www.census.gov/about/adrm/ced/apply-for-access.html?CES-TN-2023-10
    File Function: First version, 2023
    Download Restriction: CES Technical Notes may contain confidential data and, thereby, disclosure is prohibited. Researchers on approved projects (to apply for access, please see https://www.census.gov/ces/rdcresearch/howtoapply.html) with the correct permissions can request full text notes from CES.Technical.Notes.List@census.gov.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    SIPP; CMS EDB; CMS MSIS;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cen:tnotes:23-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Danielle H. Sandler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.