Este artículo se ocupa de evaluar la efectividad del uso de los activos laborales de los hogares para enfrentar choques adversos al bienestar. En particular se analiza si los hogares que implementaron estrategias consistentes con el uso de la fuerza laboral de reserva (FLR) en Argentina tuvieron resultados diferentes, en términos de bienestar, comparados con aquellos otros hogares que no implementaron ese tipo de estrategias. También se analiza si del conjunto de hogares que experimentaron descensos en sus ingresos, el grupo que implementó la movilización de su FLR pudo recomponer su situación de bienestar, comparado con el resto de hogares. English: This paper evaluates the response of the households labor supply when facing adverse shocks in their well-being. In particular, it is analyzed if the Argentinean households that implemented consistent strategies in the use of the secondary labor force (SLF), had performed —in well-being terms— differently than those that did not. Also the paper tests if the households that mobilized its SLF confronted to negative income shocks, could recompose its situation of well-being, compared with the rest of households.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Valeria Dowding).
Related research
Keywords:
Find related papers by JEL classification: J22 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Time Allocation and Labor Supply O12 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports: