IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cel/report/31.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Research Infrastructure gaps report: Central and Eastern Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Jakub Kostolný
  • Gábor Szüdi
  • Martin Kahanec
  • András Gábos
  • Zuzana Pawlowska
  • Malgorzata Pecillo

Abstract

The aim of this report is to map the gaps in data sets and research infrastructures in Central and Eastern Europe and to analyse the main obstacles and challenges that underpin these gaps. The report looks at the gaps from the perspective of four types of data: (i) international and national survey data, (ii) data provided within the InGRID project (iii) administrative data, and (iv) data on vulnerable groups. In order to study the gaps an expert questionnaire has been constructed following a roundtable discussion and pilot interviews. Two case studies with focus on gaps in data on vulnerable groups in Hungary and working conditions in Poland are presented as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Jakub Kostolný & Gábor Szüdi & Martin Kahanec & András Gábos & Zuzana Pawlowska & Malgorzata Pecillo, 2020. "Research Infrastructure gaps report: Central and Eastern Europe," Research Reports 31, Central European Labour Studies Institute (CELSI).
  • Handle: RePEc:cel:report:31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://celsi.sk/media/research_reports/edited_RR31.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthew B. Bolton & Elizabeth Minor, 2021. "Addressing the Ongoing Humanitarian and Environmental Consequences of Nuclear Weapons: An Introductory Review," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(1), pages 81-99, February.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cel:report:31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Martin Kahanec (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/celsisk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.