IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt9vj9c5v2.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Laboratory Evaluation of Corrosion Resistance of Steel Dowels in Concrete Pavement

Author

Listed:
  • Mancio, Mauricio
  • Carlos Jr., Cruz
  • Zhang, Jieying
  • Harvey, John T.
  • Monteiro, Paulo J.M.

Abstract

An extensive investigation was carried out on the corrosion performance of several types of steel dowels embedded in concrete beams, to develop recommendations for their use in different environmental conditions. Specimens were exposed to concentrated chloride solutions to accelerate corrosion. The types of dowel bars evaluated in the study were: bare carbon steel, stainless steel clad, grout-filled hollow stainless steel, microcomposite steel, carbon steel coated with flexible epoxy (green color code), and carbon steel coated with non-flexible epoxies (two types: purple and gray color codes). Half-cell potential measurements (indicative of the probability of corrosion activity),and Linear Polarization Resistance, LPR (for determining corrosion rate) were used. Every epoxy-coated bar examined had one or more defects on the coating, especially along the edges at the ends. The study was conducted in three phases. Phase I: Dowels were cast in concrete beams with joints and then subjected to a corrosive environment. Half-cell potential was monitored for six months. Phase II: similar to phase I, but using a more permeable concrete and accelerated corrosion for a period of 18 months. Half-cell potential tests, LPR curves, visual inspections, chloride content analyses, and scanning electron microscopic investigations were carried out to evaluate the corrosion performance. Phase III: consisted in testing concrete slabs with transverse joints from a DBR project in Washington State. The slabs and dowels were subjected to half-cell potential tests, LPR curves, chloride content tests, and visual inspections. Measurement of chloride contents of these and other concrete cores we used for comparison of the laboratory and field conditions. The following main recommendations are drawn. 1. Uncoated carbon steel dowels should not be used. 2. Epoxy dowels present some risk of corrosion. It is recommended that: a) Quality control checks to control holidays should be implemented, b) Bar ends should be coated with epoxy, and care must be taken during shipping, storage, and installation. 3.It is recommended that the use of stainless steel clad, hollow stainless steel, or microcomposite steel dowels should be considered for locations with high risk of high chloride exposure (such as on mountain passes and marine environments).

Suggested Citation

  • Mancio, Mauricio & Carlos Jr., Cruz & Zhang, Jieying & Harvey, John T. & Monteiro, Paulo J.M., 2007. "Laboratory Evaluation of Corrosion Resistance of Steel Dowels in Concrete Pavement," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt9vj9c5v2, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt9vj9c5v2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/9vj9c5v2.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt9vj9c5v2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.