IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt8zg3222h.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do Roads Affect Coyote and Gray Fox Movement Equally? A Case Study in Northern California

Author

Listed:
  • Schreier, Andrea
  • Coen, Amanda

Abstract

Roads can have unintended effects on wildlife populations, such as causing direct mortality through animal collisions with cars, changing animal behaviors or distributions from traffic disturbance (e.g., noise, lighting), and fragmenting habitat. Roads may also act as barriers to wildlife movements, which prevents populations on either side from exchanging genes. Over time, wildlife populations isolated by barriers will lose genetic diversity, a process associated with an increased risk of extinction. To better understand this dynamic in Northern California, a studywas completed examining whether State Route 49 (SR 49), a road initially constructed during the Gold Rush era, acts as a barrier to movements of two similar species with different tolerances to human activity, the coyote and gray fox. This policy brief summarizes findings from that study and discusses the policy implications. View the NCST Project Webpage

Suggested Citation

  • Schreier, Andrea & Coen, Amanda, 2017. "Do Roads Affect Coyote and Gray Fox Movement Equally? A Case Study in Northern California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8zg3222h, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt8zg3222h
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/8zg3222h.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Life Sciences; Data analysis; Data collection; Genetics; Rural highways; Traffic volume; Wildlife; Wildlife crossings;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt8zg3222h. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.