IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt8h24v43z.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Automated Analysis of Wildlife-Vehicle Conflict Hotspots Using Carcass and Collision Data

Author

Listed:
  • Shilling, Fraser
  • Denney, Cameron
  • Waetjen, David

Abstract

States increasingly maintain databases of wildlife-vehicle conflict (WVC), including locations of carcasses and crashes involving animals. Once these data are collected, a common and expensive barrier before they can be used in safety and environmental planning is identification of “hotspots” of incidents (here defined as locations of high-rates and/or statistically-significant clusters). In this project, we developed a web-based analytical environment that state DOTs can use to automate certain analyses of WVC hotspots in order to inform planning to improve driver and wildlife safety. Specifically, we coordinated with staff from 3 states: Idaho, Nevada, and Maine, and used data that we had for California to develop the pilot automated hotspots analysis tool. We tested several methods for representing both density and statistically-significant clustering of WVC events. These were implemented in the statistical package R and driven by scripts that can operate in the project web-system. Testing was conducted using California data while other states prepared/delivered their data. We developed hotspots analyses for California, Maine, Idaho, and Nevada based upon their input. We prepared a web-system to operate the tool (https://roadecology.ucdavis.edu/hotspots), that DOT staff from 13 states used so far with their own data.

Suggested Citation

  • Shilling, Fraser & Denney, Cameron & Waetjen, David, 2019. "Automated Analysis of Wildlife-Vehicle Conflict Hotspots Using Carcass and Collision Data," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8h24v43z, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt8h24v43z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/8h24v43z.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Engineering; Life Sciences; Databases; High risk locations; Road kill; Traffic conflicts; Web applications; Wildlife; Wildlife crossings;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt8h24v43z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.