IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt6fd4f75d.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Stakeholder Perspectives on the Sustainable Transportation Implications of On-demand Ridehailing

Author

Listed:
  • Pike, Susan

Abstract

There is much uncertainty over whether on-demand ridehailing services, namely Uber and Lyft, will worsen or alleviate existing transportation problems such as congestion, emissions, and inequities in access and mobility. For policymakers, transportation planners, and others in the transportation arena, these unknowns have created uncertainty over which policies would best steer ridehailing toward equitable and sustainable outcomes. To address these uncertainties, researchers at UC Davis assessed how stakeholders from different groups view the possible impacts of ridehailing and the policies that might best address those impacts. The researchers evaluated these questions through in-depth interviews with stakeholders from 38 agencies and organizations throughout California. Interviewees included transportation planners, members of state agencies, and representatives from non-profit organizations and the ridehailing industry. This policy brief summarizes those interviews, as well as findings from the research. View the NCST Project Webpage

Suggested Citation

  • Pike, Susan, 2021. "Stakeholder Perspectives on the Sustainable Transportation Implications of On-demand Ridehailing," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt6fd4f75d, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt6fd4f75d
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6fd4f75d.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social and Behavioral Sciences; Exhaust gases; Interviewing; Ridesourcing; Stakeholders; Sustainable transportation; Transportation planning; Uncertainty; Vehicle miles of travel;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt6fd4f75d. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.