IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt6c58n6ks.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Policy Improvements of Private Transportation in US and China

Author

Listed:
  • Xu, Tongxin

Abstract

This dissertation consists of three chapters that investigate policies aiming for improving private automobile transportation from different angles. The first chapter focuses on the efficiency of marked versus unmarked on-street parking. The study uses computer simulation that assigns queues of randomly generated vehicles to marked and unmarked spaces using a parallel world method, to directly test which method is more efficient and accommodate more cars. The simulation results show that unmarked spacing is more efficient only when the curb is shorter, or not close to any integer times of the optimal length of one marked space, and when drivers are all considerate when choosing the parking location. This simulation study also finds vehicle downsizing only helps the owners of the downsized vehicles themselves, while making it more difficult for all other people to find parking. The second chapter focuses on the engine size tax in China. Using regressions based on data of vehicle trims offered in China from 2004 to 2016, the study shows that the engine size tax drove automakers to downsize engines and cluster sizes around cutoff points related to the taxes. The tax affects fuel efficiency in opposite directions. On one hand, engine size tax encouraged engine downsizing in China and contribute to an improvement in fuel efficiency. On the other hand, using cutoff points to differentiate tax rates also encouraged automakers to use turbocharging technology to increase horsepower, which compromised improvements in fuel consumption. The third chapter focuses on the impacts of fuel price changes on vehicle consumption in US and China. This study conducted a comparative analysis of US and China automobile market using historical vehicle sales data linked with gasoline prices and vehicle attributes including fuel consumption rates. The results reveal a major difference in vehicle purchasing behavior between US and China. US consumers are strongly affected by fuel price and purchase vehicles with better fuel economy when gasoline prices are higher and vice versa, while Chinese consumers do not seem to be affected by gasoline price changes much. This difference implies different policies are needed to reduce fuel consumption in the two countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu, Tongxin, 2019. "Policy Improvements of Private Transportation in US and China," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt6c58n6ks, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt6c58n6ks
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6c58n6ks.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt6c58n6ks. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.