Tobacco Control in Tennessee: Stakeholder Analysis of the Development of the NonÂ¬Smoker Protection Act, 2007
AbstractIn 2007, although Tennessee was (and still is) the third largest tobaccoÂ¬producing state, it enacted the NonÂ¬Smoker Protection Act (NSPA), making most enclosed public and workplaces, and restaurants 100% smoke-free. This study triangulates archival documents with interviews, legislative debates and quantitative data for a stakeholder analysis of why and how the diverse interests in the state collaborated to develop the policy and identifies areas and opportunities for improvement. The study utilizes the policy cycle and stages of policy development approach and three public policy models â€“ garbage can or multiple streams, policy networks, and socioÂ¬economic influences â€“ to give us understanding of the phases of the development of the NSPA â€“ agenda-setting, legislative development, and implementation. While the dominant thesis for the origin of this smokeÂ¬free policy (SFP) was governmentÂ¬centered, the activities of nonÂ¬governmental actors, such as efforts by students of University of Tennessee in Knoxville to have smokeÂ¬free domitories and that of Campaign for Healthy and Responsible Tennessee (CHART) to repeal preemption (nongovernmentalÂ¬centered thesis), and societal changes (bubbleÂ¬up thesis) contributed to its emergence. The SFP entered the stateâ€™s policy agenda when the problem of tobacco use in the state (health consequences and costs) and policy solutions (including SFP) became coupled with favorable political circumstances involving Governor Phil Bredesenâ€™s unexpected announcement of support for a statewide SFP during smokeÂ¬free state buildings bill signing ceremony in June 2006. This announcement created a window of opportunity for SFP change, which was seized by a change agent in the state, CHART. In February 2007, the Governor included SFP in the administration's legislative package for the 105th Legislative Session. Additionally, SFP bills were sponsored in both houses of the Legislature to make SFP a priority item on the stateâ€™s policy agenda. The development of the NSPA was facilitated by factors, such as the administrationâ€™s continuous support for the SFP, activities of CHART, public support for the SFP, UÂ¬turn in the position of Tennessee Restaurant Association (now Tennessee Hospitality Association) to support 100% SFP and limited opposition from tobacco interests in the state. Although implementation of the NSPA has generally proceeded smoothly, about half of the stakeholders prefer that the exemptions are repealed, particularly those for ageÂ¬restricted venues, nonÂ¬enclosed areas of public places and private businesses with three or fewer employees. This study suggests that there is high level of knowledge on tobacco use (the problem) and control (policy solutions) in policy circles and the key remaining factors for policy change are favorable political environment and a change agent. The development of the NSPA suggests that proponents for policy change should know and understand their policy and political environment and be alert for any change that will facilitate the development of an SFP.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco in its series University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education with number qt8z38c04x.
Date of creation: 01 Oct 2011
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.escholarship.org/repec/ctcre/
Tennessee; tobaccoÂ¬producing; smokeÂ¬free policy; tobacco control; legislation; Social and Behavioral Sciences; Medicine and Health Sciences; Policy Design; Analysis; and Evaluation; Policy History; Theory; and Methods; Social Policy;
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2012-03-28 (All new papers)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Lisa Schiff).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.