IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/ctcres/qt5hj06178.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

First-Run Smoking Presentations in U.S. Movies 1999-2003

Author

Listed:
  • Polansky, Jonathan R.
  • Glantz, Stanton A. PhD

Abstract

Smoking among American adults fell by half between 1950 and 2002, yet smoking on U.S. movie screens reached historic heights in 2002, topping levels observed a half century earlier. Tobacco’s comeback in movies has serious public health implications, because smoking on screen stimulates adolescents to start smoking,2,3 accounting for an estimated 52% of adolescent smoking initiation. Equally important, researchers have observed a dose-response relationship between teens’ exposure to on-screen smoking and smoking initiation: the greater teens’ exposure to smoking in movies, the more likely they are to start smoking. Conversely, if their exposure to smoking in movies were reduced, proportionately fewer teens would likely start smoking. To track smoking trends at the movies, previous analyses have studied the U.S. motion picture industry’s top-grossing films with the heaviest advertising support, deepest audience penetration, and highest box office earnings.4,5 This report is the first to examine the U.S. movie industry’s total output. It is also the first to identify smoking movies, tobacco incidents and tobacco impressions with the companies that produced and/or distributed the films — and with their parent corporations, which claim responsibility for tobacco content choices.† Examining Hollywood’s product line-up, before and after the public voted at the box office, sheds light on individual studios’ content decisions and industry-wide production patterns amenable to policy reform. We surveyed all U.S.-produced live action films released to theaters in the five years between December 25, 1998, and December 24, 2003, and offer three different measures of smoking in movies: 1. INTENTION: Number of films that include smoking (and those smokefree) by year, Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) age-classification, and corporation responsible; 2. PERFORMANCE: Number of smoking incidents in these films (an index of smoking intensity) by year, MPAA age-classification, and corporation responsible; 3. IMPACT: Number of smoking impressions (each film’s smoking incidents x tickets sold) delivered to theatrical audiences overall, to children aged 6-11 and to teens aged 12-17, by year, MPAA age-classification, and corporation responsible. Because exposure to smoking in movies accounts for more than half of smoking initiation by U.S. adolescents, we pay particular attention to smoking in movies rated G/PG and PG-13 and to the effect of the proposed R-rating for tobacco use on screen. KEY FINDINGS Analysis of 776 U.S. movies released in the five years 1999-2003 established that: • 80% of all films across the board included smoking — almost 90% of R-rated films, 80% of PG-13 movies and 50% of G/PG movies. • Three media conglomerates — Time Warner, Disney and Sony — accounted for more than half of all movies with smoking and 55% of all tobacco impressions delivered to children and teens. • The number of a studio’s releases ultimately determined its ranking in most tobacco dimensions. Companies with fewer releases tended to concentrate more of their tobacco incidents in films rated PG-13 but tobacco content patterns were otherwise remarkably uniform across major motion picture companies. • Confirming past analyses, individual R-rated movies with smoking averaged twice as many tobacco incidents as youth-rated movies with smoking. • The number of PG-13 releases with smoking has remained stable over five years. A five-year decline in R-rated releases and sharply lower ticket sales in 2003 has shifted the majority of tobacco incidents and impressions into movies rated G, PG and PG-13. • The U.S. movie industry delivered an estimated 32.6 billion first-run theatrical tobacco impressions to audiences of all ages over the past five years. A quarter of these impressions — 8.3 billion evenly divided between youth-rated and R-rated movies — were delivered to children and teens. Time Warner alone delivered a quarter of child and teen tobacco impressions. • More first-run tobacco impressions are delivered to teen moviegoers 12-17 than to children 6-11 or young adults 18-34 — 1,350 larger-than-life impressions per capita between 1999 and 2003. This estimate does not include the tobacco impressions delivered by a movie with smoking’s theatrical and on-air advertising trailers or from multiple viewings of the movie on pre-recorded video media and on cable, on-demand and broadcast television. • By all measures, over the past five years rating on-screen smoking “R” would reduce children’s and teens’ first-run theatrical exposure to tobacco impressions, strongly associated with teens’ smoking initiation, by at least 50%.

Suggested Citation

  • Polansky, Jonathan R. & Glantz, Stanton A. PhD, 2004. "First-Run Smoking Presentations in U.S. Movies 1999-2003," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt5hj06178, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:ctcres:qt5hj06178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/5hj06178.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:ctcres:qt5hj06178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://escholarship.org/uc/ctcre/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.