IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdh/ebrief/169.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Who Else Benefits from CETA? Some Implications of Most-Favoured Nation Treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Lawrence Herman

    (Herman & Associates)

Abstract

Investors from US and Mexico and other third-party countries will benefit from the Canada-EU trade deal when it comes to investing in Canada, according to a report released today by the C.D. Howe Institute. In “Who Else Benefits from CETA? Some Implications of Most-Favoured Nation Treatment,” respected trade lawyer Lawrence L. Herman concludes that investors from countries that have preferential trade agreements with Canada will be entitled to the same preferential benefits as EU investors under the Canada-EU trade deal. While the recently negotiated trade agreement between Canada and the European Union (EU) will provide greater market access for exports of goods, services and investments from each party to the other, an intriguing question is whether the trade pact will have beneficial side effects for Canada’s other trading partners, by virtue of the “Most-Favoured Nation” rule of international trade law. This E-Brief finds that under the terms of Canada’s WTO membership and Foreign Investment Protection Agreements (FIPAs), the answer is no. However, with respect to investors and investments from the United States, Mexico, Peru, Chile and others with which Canada has preferential trade agreements (PTAs), the answer is yes.

Suggested Citation

  • Lawrence Herman, 2013. "Who Else Benefits from CETA? Some Implications of Most-Favoured Nation Treatment," e-briefs 169, C.D. Howe Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdh:ebrief:169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cdhowe.org/who-else-benefits-ceta-some-implications-%E2%80%9Cmost-favoured-nation%E2%80%9D-treatment
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Policy;

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdh:ebrief:169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kristine Gray (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cdhowca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.