According to public interest theory, professional licensing solves the lemon problem generated by asymmetric information. In contrast, capture theory claims that licensing aims at increasing professional salaries by restricting supply. This paper shows that the two theories can be identified using data from one regulated profession and provides an empirical application to the US market for lawyers. The results imply that lawyers' salaries have a large weight relative to social welfare in the objective function of licensing boards.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Collegio Carlo Alberto in its series Carlo Alberto Notebooks with number
106.
Find related papers by JEL classification: L4 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies L5 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy K2 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports: