This paper presents a simple theory and test of an efficiency hypothesis for academic tenure and the process by which it is granted. Our approach argues that tenure is a response to the high cost of measuring academic potential and has survived as a low cost method by which the university can better match potential entrants with incumbents and so promote superior performance by its departments. The probationary period leading into the tenure decision then becomes one where coordination gains can arise from better measurement, evaluation, and integration of new faculty. It follows that tighter tenure standards require greater evaluation efforts with greater turnover and success should result in superior department performance. To test the hypothesis, Dnes and Seaton's (2001) distinction between UK universities that prior to 1988 offered hard versus soft forms of tenure and data from the UK Research Assessment Exercise are used . After controlling for more easily measured inputs into department performance, tenure status remains a positive predictor of ranking across UK departments of economics.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Carleton University, Department of Economics in its series Carleton Economic Papers with number
02-06.
Length: 30 pages Date of creation: 01 Apr 2002 Date of revision: Publication status: Published: Carleton Economic Working Paper Handle: RePEc:car:carecp:02-06
Contact details of provider: Postal: 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa Ontario, K1S 5B6 Canada Phone: 1-613-520-3744 Fax: 1-613-520-3906
Order Information: Email:
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Deirdre Nelson).
Find related papers by JEL classification: K0 - Law and Economics - - General L2 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior L3 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise J2 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: