The interpretation of globalization amongst Chinese business leaders: a managerial and organizational cognition approach
AbstractMuch of what has been reported about the impact of globalization is based on macroeconomic and social analyses. There is a dearth of research on the meaning and impact of globalization at the individual level. This paper attempts to fill this gap in the literature. The paper is divided into two sections; section one provides a brief review of literature on the conceptualization and meaning of globalization. Section two presents the results of a survey of a sample of 128 Chinese business people and professionals in the city of Beijing. The survey attempts to explore answer to questions such as: What do ordinary Chinese business people and professionals think of globalization? Do Chinese consider globalization mainly as an economic phenomenon or socio-political phenomenon? What are the practical and research implications of the meanings of globalization? The answer to these questions should shed light on the potential impact of the individual dimension of globalization. This assumption is based on the managerial and organizational cognition (MOC) literature, which suggests that interpretation and meanings attached by managers to events and phenomenon can explain their actions and organizational strategy (Hodgkinson, 2007; Mintznerg, Ahlsband & Lampel, 1998). Therefore the meaning attached to globalization by business people and professionals who can influence government policies directly or indirectly can shed light on the type of policy and strategy they might advocate or how they might react to government policies vis-à-vis globalization.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by BWPI, The University of Manchester in its series Brooks World Poverty Institute Working Paper Series with number 4808.
Date of creation: 2008
Date of revision:
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Rowena Harding).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.