IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/btx/wpaper/1532.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do experts help firms optimise?

Author

Listed:
  • James Mahon

    (Harvard University)

  • Eric Zwick

    (Chicago Booth and NBER)

Abstract

We study the role of paid preparers in the take-up of a tax refund for corporate losses, a provision of the U.S. tax code that made $357 billion available to eligible firms between 1998 and 2011. Drawing a sample of 1.2 million observations from the population of corporate tax returns, we present three findings. First, only 37 percent of eligible firms claim their refund. Second, a cost-benefit analysis of the tax loss choice cannot explain the low take-up rate. Third, firms with sophisticated preparers, such as licensed accountants, are more likely to claim the refund. Moving from the 10th to 90th percentile in a predicted preparer effect based on observables would increase take-up by 9.4 percentage points. To show that firm selection cannot explain the observed preparer effect, we validate this result with a research design based on preparer deaths and relocations. Our results reject the standard view that firms optimize perfectly with respect to taxes.

Suggested Citation

  • James Mahon & Eric Zwick, 2015. "Do experts help firms optimise?," Working Papers 1532, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
  • Handle: RePEc:btx:wpaper:1532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Business_Taxation/Docs/Publications/Working_Papers/series-15/WP1532.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eric Zwick & James Mahon, 2017. "Tax Policy and Heterogeneous Investment Behavior," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(1), pages 217-248, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:btx:wpaper:1532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dongxian Guo (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sbsoxuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.