Formula Apportionment: Is it better than the current system and are there better alternatives?
AbstractThis analysis of formula apportionment compared to the current system is based on the observation that income shifting has two sources, intangible income and debt. The analysis also recognizes that a major goal of the transfer pricing or income allocation system is to preserve the tax neutrality between arm’s length and related party transactions and between multinational and single jurisdiction companies. It therefore develops a model that highlights these features. Both separate accounts (SA) and formula apportionment (FA) distort behavior but along different margins. Under SA, companies have an incentive to shift high-tech activities and to manipulate transfer prices. Under FA, companies do not manipulate transfer prices but they have an incentive to shift routine activities abroad and to change the degree to which they depend on outside suppliers. Simulations based on the model indicate that FA has no clear advantage over SA even when the model assumes that an unrealistically large amount of resources are devoted to tax planning under SA. Furthermore, straightforward changes could be made in SA that would result in substantial improvements without resorting to full-fledged FA. We also examine the complicating role of financial assets under FA and how ongoing R&D is implicitly allocated. The conceptual basis for the conventional formulas are discussed, particularly ones based on sales. Finally, a static, no behavioral change, estimate of the effect of FA on the tax liabilities of US multinational corporations is presented for 1996 and 2004. The static estimate for 2004 suggests a potentially large revenue gain, but the simulations show that tax revenues under FA and SA are similar when behavioral responses are taken into account.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation in its series Working Papers with number 0901.
Date of creation: 2009
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Park End Street, Oxford OX1 1HP UK
Phone: +44 (0)1865 288800
Fax: +44 (0)1865 288805
Web page: http://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/ideas-impact/tax/
More information through EDIRC
Corporate taxation; Separate Accountin; Formula Apportionment;
Other versions of this item:
- Altshuler, Rosanne & Grubert, Harry, 2010. "Formula Apportionment: Is It Better Than The Current System And Are There Better Alternatives?," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 63(4), pages 1145-1184, December.
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- David Wildasin, 2009.
"State Corporation Income Taxation; An Economic Perspective on Nexus,"
2009-08, University of Kentucky, Institute for Federalism and Intergovernmental Relations.
- Wildasin, David E., 2010. "State Corporation Income Taxation: An Economic Perspective On Nexus," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 63(4), pages 903-24, December.
- David E. Wildasin, 2010. "State Corporation Income Taxation - An Economic Perspective on Nexus," CESifo Working Paper Series 3218, CESifo Group Munich.
- David E.Wildasin, 2010. "State Corporation Income Taxation: An Economic Perspective on Nexus," Working Papers 1011, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
- Harry Grubert & Rosanne Altshuler, 2013. "Fixing the System: An Analysis of Alternative Proposals for the Reform of International Tax," Departmental Working Papers 201305, Rutgers University, Department of Economics.
- Fuest, Clemens & Spengel, Christoph & Finke, Katharina & Heckemeyer, Jost H. & Nusser, Hannah, 2013.
"Profit shifting and 'aggressive' tax planning by multinational firms: Issues and options for reform,"
ZEW Discussion Papers
13-078, ZEW - Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung / Center for European Economic Research.
- Fuest, Clemens & Spengel, Christoph & Finke, Katharina & Heckemeyer, Jost & Nusser, Hannah, 2013. "Profit shifting and 'aggressive' tax planning by multinational firms: Issues and options for reform," ZEW Discussion Papers 13-044, ZEW - Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung / Center for European Economic Research.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Li Liu).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.