Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

History or path dependence in mixed-Poisson growth: Brazil, 1822-2000, and USA, 1869-1996, with an estimate of the world mixing distribution at start-up

Contents:

Author Info

  • Steve de Castro

    ()
    (Departamento de Economia (Department of Economics) Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Ciência da Informação e Documentação (FACE) (Faculty of Economics, Administration, Accounting and Information Science) Universidade de Brasília)

  • Flávio Gonçalves

    (Departamento de Economia, UFPR)

Abstract

The growth empirics of two separate but related issues are studied. In the first, the annual data on GDP per person (GDPpp) for Brazil, 1822-2000, and the US, 1869-1996, were converted into arrival times for innovations defined as permanent increments to GDPpp of given size (e.g. 3%). We say an economy exhibits history dependence if its arrival times can be shown to come from a homogenous Poisson process, that is, with a constant mean arrival rate of innovations (the Poisson parameter, λ). Brazil’s growth trajectory since 1822 is shown not to be history dependent in this sense, though both its truncated series, 1889-2000, and the US, 1869-1996, passed the tests. Brazil’s stagnation in the mid to late 19th century, when coupled to its growth spurt in the 20th, is the suggested reason for the failure. The second study uses the Summers-Heston data for 134 economies in 2000 to estimate a discrete, theoretical distribution for the λ at start-up in 1800, based on the (unproved) assumption that each economy drew an arrival rate from this “mixing” distribution and stayed with it. The results show that if innovations are assumed to be big, rare events, then the world mixing distribution will be skewed, and all the λ drawn at start-up will be almost equal and thus the dispersion of incomes across nations 200 years later will then be due only to random variations along paths generated by the same homogenous Poisson process.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://e-groups.unb.br/face/eco/textos/didaticos/WP%20332.pdf
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 500 Can't connect to e-groups.unb.br:80 (Bad hostname). If this is indeed the case, please notify (Luciano Póvoa)
File Function: First version, 2010
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Departamento de Economia da Universidade de Brasilia in its series Working papers - Textos para Discussao do Departamento de Economia da Universidade de Brasilia with number 332.

as in new window
Length: 37 pages
Date of creation: Nov 2010
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:brs:wpaper:332

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Universidade de Brasília UnB - Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro Asa Norte CEP 70910-900, Brasília, Brasil
Phone: 55-61-3107-6704
Fax: (61) 340-2311
Email:
Web page: http://e-groups.unb.br/face/eco/
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: stochastic growth; mixed Poisson processes; statistical tests;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:brs:wpaper:332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Luciano Póvoa).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.