IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bon/boncrc/crctr224_2020_202.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

What Is 'Competition Law'? - Measuring EU Member States' Leeway to Regulate Platform-to-Business Agreements

Author

Listed:
  • Jens-Uwe Franck
  • Nils Stock

Abstract

If both national competition law and article 101 TFEU apply to an agreement, the former must not set rules that are stricter than the latter. Member States remain free, though, to impose stricter rules if they are not classified as ‘competition law’. We analyse relevant jurisprudence by the English and French courts that have dealt with potential conflicts between, on the one hand, EU competition law and, on the other hand, the common law restraint of trade doctrine and the pratiques restrictives de concurrence under French commercial law. We develop criteria that allow (national) ‘competition law’ to be distinguished from similar regulatory interventions into agreements that pursue purposes distinct from article 101 TFEU and which, therefore, must not be regarded as ‘competition law’. This paper illustrates and elaborates on the challenges for the implementation of our approach by focusing on the ban on the use of parity clauses by hotel booking platforms in France, Austria, Italy and Belgium. We map a possible way forward to prevent further regulatory fragmentation in the internal market with regard to the regulation of platform-to-business agreements.

Suggested Citation

  • Jens-Uwe Franck & Nils Stock, 2020. "What Is 'Competition Law'? - Measuring EU Member States' Leeway to Regulate Platform-to-Business Agreements," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2020_202, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2020_202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.crctr224.de/research/discussion-papers/archive/dp202
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    competition law; regulation; article 3(2) of Regulation 1/2003; objective pursued by article 101 TFEU; restraint of trade doctrine; pratiques restrictives de concurrence; platform- to-business agreements; price-parity clauses; Regulation 2019/1150;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K21 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Antitrust Law

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2020_202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CRC Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.crctr224.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.